|
|
 |
The Washington Post
Eugene L. Meyer
03/31/03
The District school board president's newfound support for a school voucher program advocated by the Bush administration drew sharp criticism yesterday from educators, elected leaders and parent advocacy groups.
Peggy Cooper Cafritz, who only last month declared the board "solidly against vouchers," said in an op-ed piece published Saturday in The Washington Post that "some version of" the administration-backed legislation funding a pilot project here is "certain to pass" and that D.C. officials should "accept the federally proposed voucher or scholarship program."
But Cafritz said the District should insist that vouchers be used only in private schools within the city; that Catholic archdiocese schools -- the most likely beneficiaries of the program -- be held accountable for test scores and high academic standards; and that officials continue to support traditional public schools and charter schools.
"I was shocked, and everybody I've talked to is shocked," said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.). "What Peggy has proposed is unprincipled and operationally impossible, and it won't happen."
Support for voucher programs, which provide public money to send children to private schools, is rare among big-city school officials. District leaders questioned why Cafritz would strike out on her own.
"This is not the sort of thing we need to Lone Ranger about," said council member Sharon Ambrose (D-Ward 6). "Quite frankly, if Peggy would tend to her responsibilities as president of the board and make sure we didn't have hundreds of employees we couldn't account for and leave overall city policymaking to the mayor and council, we might all be better off."
Parent and teacher advocates were also distressed.
"I find it absolutely disappointing that anybody in this community believes we have to accept vouchers," said Iris Toyer, president of the Stanton Elementary School PTA in Southeast Washington and co-chairman of Parents United for D.C. Schools. "To me, it's just a diversion. We strongly believe [vouchers] do nothing to improve the quality of education for the overwhelming number of children in this community."
Added Frank Bolden, president of the principals' union: "My opinion is we don't need them. What we need to do is make some substantive changes in our own public school system so we can be about the business of educating children."
Cafritz did not return telephone calls yesterday.
The embattled school board president had at least one supporter. Laura D. Gardner, an at-large board member appointed by Mayor Anthony A. Williams (D), said: "The concept of vouchers doesn't frighten me one bit. I view it just as I view charter schools: Public education needs competition."
Cafritz's apparent change of heart was a surprise to supporters and critics of the voucher program. Gardner said the issue had not been formally discussed by the board.
"It's a big shift," agreed council member Kevin P. Chavous (D-Ward 7), head of the panel's education committee. "I'm hopeful and confident she was motivated by her commitment to young people in the city."
Chavous has been a skeptic of vouchers, but yesterday he said his main concern is that such programs be adopted locally and not imposed by the White House and Congress. "If we're going to expand school choice into vouchers, there has to be a grass-roots public discussion."
So far, the District has chosen to offer public charter schools as a choice to its 69,000 schoolchildren. The city has 40 charter schools that operate tuition-free, with public funds, outside the school bureaucracy.
"If there is a scholarship program put in place," Chavous said, "we wouldn't support it coming from District funds and would be more open to it if it's new federal dollars and there's additional support for the D.C. public schools and [public] charter schools."
George C. Springer, administrator of the Washington Teachers' Union, could not be reached yesterday, but the American Federation of Teachers, with which the local union is affiliated, opposes voucher programs that transfer tax dollars from public to private schools.
Norton also objects to that.
"There's one pot," she said. "What comes out of that pot for private schools must come out of the public schools. [Cafritz] needs to go for every penny she can find, not for dividing the pot between public and private schools. Also, she doesn't know what she is talking about when she says the bill will pass."
The notion of making Catholic schools publicly accountable, Norton said, is also unworkable. "Religious schools can't make themselves accountable to the state any more than the church can."
In February, President Bush said that as part of his 2004 budget proposal he would ask Congress to institute a school voucher program in the District and a select number of other cities. How much individual students would receive remains unclear, but previous proposals have ranged from $3,000 to $6,000.
Private school tuition in the District is about $15,000 to $23,000, with Catholic schools charging $3,100 to $4,770.
© 2003 The Washington Post Company
|